Alison Motluk worked at the Science Centre from 1987 to 1989 as a host, and from 2019 to 2021 as a science writer. She did not witness what happened at the end, but she talked to people who did.
Everyone noticed the fence posts going into the ground. They saw the fencing start to go up. It ran around the front of the building, alongside the parking lots and down the service road into the valley. Staff wondered in emails what was up. There were theories. It was Metrolinx, the Ontario Line. Or something to do with building repairs. Or maybe it was a new strategy to control parking during the upcoming summer camp crush.
What no one suspected was that it was a perimeter fence being put up to secure the building they were working in. Or that the following day, Friday, June 21, 2024, the Ontario Science Centre they and the rest of the province had known and loved for almost 55 years would be unceremoniously and inexplicably shut down.
Staff showed up for work that next morning as usual. There was a message around 11 a.m., instructing them to attend an “all staff meeting” that afternoon. People working from home were asked to join remotely, but people in the building were told to leave their posts in order to attend—something that almost never happened. It put them on edge.
These people were no strangers to bad news. In June 2022, they’d been told that “the bridge”—a key passageway from the front of the building to the middle and the back—would have to close due to safety concerns. Then, the following year, in April 2023, they were told they’d be moving from their home at 770 Don Mills Road to a yet-to-be-imagined facility at Ontario Place.
As it turned out, there was no need to wait for the all-staff meeting to get the news. Around noon, the Toronto Star published an article with the headline “Ford government abruptly closes Ontario Science Centre after report found roof in danger of collapsing.” A link began circulating in workplace group chats. Some staff found out while they were hosting exhibits or interacting with visitors. Some learned from visitors, a few of whom gazed nervously overhead, asking if it was safe to even be there.
Many who read the article didn’t believe it. It would only be a temporary closure, they reasoned, maybe in the fall. Peak season was about to begin, summer camps were booked, they’d just brought in a new exhibition and a new movie.
But in the 2 p.m. meeting, the worst was confirmed. Engineers had discovered, management told them, that the roof was at risk of collapsing in the event of heavy rain or snow. A difficult decision had been made. The Ontario Science Centre would close that very day. They had until October 31 to get out of the building.
Shock. Rage. Helplessness. Devastation. Grief. That’s what people were feeling. It was like a death—an unexpected, untimely death.
Staff knew that the building had been neglected for over a decade and that repairs were needed. But that it had to be closed immediately? They didn’t buy it.
About 250 people work at the Science Centre and they are an unusual bunch—highly engaged, dedicated, probing. Their central mandate is to get people to ask questions. Not surprisingly, they had many. Why can’t the building stay open for the summer? Why not fix the roof? Why not close the building in sections during repairs? What is the evidence of imminent danger? How does this new report square with reports from the joint health and safety committee? What about the hundreds of other Ontario buildings that had the same concrete tiles—and weren’t closing? Why October 31? Can this be fought?
When the meeting was over, many staff, including some whose shifts had ended, went out onto the floor. It was hitting them that this might really be it. They put on their white lab coats and did the things the Science Centre does. Just like the promos promise, they delighted, they informed, they challenged. They made hair stand on end till the very last minute. The building was full of people—so alive. It didn’t feel like this could be the end, but it was.
When they left the building that night, the large digital billboard out front had already been changed to read “Closed.”
The Science Centre was built in 1969 as a Centennial gift to the people of Ontario. It was designed by Raymond Moriyama to be deliberately confusing so that you could go inside and get lost in science and wonder. It was revolutionary in that the exhibits were made to be handled. There were live demonstrations too—in the glory days, there was everything from a laser show to a TV studio, from a planetarium to a working foundry, a cryogenics lab to a print shop. And, of course, there was the iconic electricity show, with the Van de Graaff generator, a.k.a. the ball that makes your hair stand up.
These are the things most people think of when they recall their school field trips and family visits. But the building contained other things too. Most extraordinarily, within those walls were workshops with craftspeople—woodworkers, metalworkers, electricians, artists, designers, and more—who worked together across expertise to research, develop, and fabricate on site. It was the secret sauce. It was why the exhibits could be so good. An international sales department, also in-house, sold and rented these creations to other museums, and took orders for bespoke exhibits.
There were science educators, to teach school groups about physics or DNA or space flight simulation. There were summer camps, birthday parties, sleepovers, weddings, and corporate retreats. There was a whole class of grade 12 students inside that building, lockers and teenage drama and all, doing a full semester of science and innovation.
Now all this, everything, had to be packed up.
Some people believe that the Ontario Science Centre is an entity separate from its building, but I’m not one of them. I think that the soul is hard to extract from the body. There was something about that bridge with its spectacular views across the valley, the long escalators with blue jays and cardinals out the windows, the nature walks and celestial viewing parties. Something about how everywhere you turned there was something you wanted to spend time with. A tower of garbage! Inuit snow goggles! A bird’s eye view of flight! A room that spun so you could feel centrifugal force! The escalators, the movie theatre, the bathrooms—they all tried to show and to teach.
If the closing of the building felt like a death, the emptying of the building was a sort of washing of the body. It was intimate, emotional work. The employees could have hired outsiders to do it all, but these exhibits and artifacts were their babies, and they wanted to wrap them and send them off with care and dignity.
Still, it was hard. It always is when there’s an unexplained death. They were never given a rational explanation for closing the building. Architects argued it was safe to keep open. The engineering report said as much. People had offered to pay for the repairs. Yet here they were, preparing the corpse. Some felt complicit and dirty. Others felt it was duty.
Just getting into the building was a trial. There were now checkpoints. Gates had been installed after the closure, and there were two sets of security guards, one their own and another brought in from outside, making sure everyone was legit. There was even a police officer.
The packing up and moving out—or “decant,” as the process is called—was chaotic. There was mass confusion. Who could blame them? Half a century of museum and four months to figure it out. What would be kept, what would be decommissioned, what would go to interim locations? It was more top-down than people wanted. They worried they’d never see some of these items again.
People were losing sleep, gaining weight, getting sick, feeling sad. They were demoralized and heartbroken. Still, they painstakingly dismembered exhibits, wrapping them and labelling them. Live animals who’d lived and been loved in the building—a huge tortoise, the many creatures of the Rainforest—had to be re-homed. The loom was given away. The gigantic whale skeleton was packed up, but it’s not clear where it was taken.
Other treasures appear to have been left behind. The Breath exhibit in Human Edge. The Castle in KidSpark. The climbing wall. The Silent Tunnel. The tall trees in the Rainforest. The murals painted onto the walls.
The tree ring, too. You know the tree ring—the huge cross-section of Sitka spruce that had hundreds of rings because it had been alive that many years? The one where kids would stand with their arms out to show how big it was? That school groups used as their meet-up point? It was still there at the end. It had a little sticky note on it, and with the kind of double entendre the Science Centre had become famous for, it said, simply, “Heavy.”
For a building at risk of imminent collapse there sure was a lot of activity inside. All this packing and crating, scores of staff. Just three and a half weeks after the closure, Toronto saw some of the most catastrophic rainfall on record. A month of rain fell in one day. Union Station flooded, power was knocked out across the city, and the Don Valley Parkway became a river with floating cars.
Some 75 people were working inside the Ontario Science Centre building on the day of the torrential downpour. No warning was given to staff about danger. No one was instructed to evacuate the building. And as it happens, the roof did not fall. It did not even leak.
The hypocrisy and despair and uncertainty was a lot to take. A handful of salaried staff opted to exit with a retirement package. It was a hard end for people who’d put their whole careers into it. But more than half of Ontario Science Centre workers were not salaried, but on fixed-term contracts. They were faced with uncertain hours and pay, and conditions of work that they had not signed up for.
There had been a push to create pop-ups, for instance, at the CNE, Wonderland, Word on the Street, Buskerfest, Toronto Zoo, and elsewhere. Questions about transporting equipment, changed hours, longer commutes were all up in the air. Arrangements were made to establish satellite locations, too, in places like Sherway Gardens shopping mall and Harbourfront Centre. No one pretends these are the real deal—they are called Ontario Science Centre “Experiences.” I call them Ghosts.
These events sometimes turn into wakes. Visitors keep coming up and expressing their condolences. They reminisce about a loved one lost. They ask what they can do to help.
But employees, who work for the Ontario government, have scripts to follow and talking points. They are instructed, regularly, on what they can and cannot say, both to the public and on social media. Only happy talk is allowed, and if visitors bring up politics, staff are supposed to redirect them to, for instance, put their names on the mailing list.
Various counsellors and trainers have been brought in to help staff manage their feelings. Take deep breaths. Listen to your body. Also: Life is what you make of it. You are unhappy with the situation because you are choosing to be unhappy. Not, I guess, because you are grief-stricken and the situation is objectively awful.
As the eviction date neared, many wondered what would become of the building. Mysteriously, there had been asbestos abatement over the summer. Why? Heating systems were being repaired. What for? Later, truckloads of scaffolding arrived. Were they finally fixing the bridge? The roof? Why was money going into the building only as the Science Centre was being forced out?
There was no big goodbye. Just a pressure, a rush, to leave. More expulsion than farewell. On the last day, they were simply gone.
On November 1, the day after the last day, I took a walk around the perimeter fence and peered in at the building. I felt ashamed. The government had been so afraid of us. They thought we’d fight and rally there. They thought we’d bust our way in. They thought that the kidnapping and murder of this institution—this centennial-year gift that was ours—would bring us out in force, and make us fierce. Oh, how we disappointed.